Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31456445-20171201224001/@comment-31456445-20171201224816

BrianME wrote: I do agree with you. However, there are some drawbacks:

1: If you want Youtube to put more ads on the videos, then how come you suggest more people use Ad-Blockers? Isn't that ironic?

2: Not use Youtube at all? Seriously? What will that accomplish?

3: Your kinda going off-topic and saying that all Youtubers deserve more freedom. If your going with SML only, then I guess that's fine, but with ALL Youtubers? It would make more sense if you put this on the Youtube Wiki instead.

Overall, I think the protest and boycott just to save 1 channel is kinda unnecessary, and plus, Youtube will respond by either demonetizing all of SML's videos, or even delete his channel and the one's he's associated with. And then we'll have a American Revolution all over again. But I guess the plan might get SML fixed. Okay, about the ad-block. I think it's ironic and I'll remove that. On the other hand, I think that it shouldn't be SML that'll be saved. I've seen other Youtubers having a same problem too. I think if we can get those boycotts and protests done right, then we can get Susan fired and pull Youtube out of this hellhole!

And as for the situation becoming like the American Revolution, I think it's just uncalled for. And plus, who would wanna go to war and put their lives on the lines just to get some Internet stars more money?