Talk:Jeffy's Tantrum!/@comment-33205590-20171002220753

Why is everyone saying this is Mario and/or Jeffy torture? This video wasn't either of them. Here's are reasons why this isn't Mario torture nor Jeffy torture, especially the latter.\

Why this wasn't Mario torture:

1) Jeffy was annoying Mario for the game, which does not count as torture.

2) Jeffy broke some of his stuff, but that still doesn't count as torture. Sure, Mario may have pay a high price to replace the items Jeffy broke, but that's probably the only inconvience Mario received as a result of Jeffy breaking his stuff. Besides, Mario sold Jeffy's iPad to replace the couch, so Jeffy got what he deserved.

Why this wasn't Jeffy torture:

1) Mario refused to buy Jeffy the game, but is that really torture? Besides, he had bought Jeffy some other game the previous week, so Jeffy should suck it up and play that one.

2) Sure, Mario beat Jeffy with a belt. However, that is a reasonable consequence for breaking a couch and an expensive TV, and actually expecting Mario to buy the game after that. Besides, some of my friend's parents do the same thing if they get a bad grade, and they're not considered child abusers, so it's perfectly reasonable for Mario to belt Jeffy since he broke a couch and a costly TV.

3) Jeffy was not traumatized after Mario beat him with the belt. He was clearly exaggerating, and was only acting this way to leverage Mario into buying the game, as revealed when Jeffy said the only thing that can make him stop acting emo was Mario buying him the game.

4) Mario selling Jeffy's iPad to pay for the new couch was a comeuppance for Jeffy, since he broke the couch in the first place.

5) Mario can do whatever he wants with the iPad, since he presumably bought it for Jeffy. So Mario techinically possess the iPad as well.

6) Keep in mind that Jeffy has another Apple product, his iPhone 7, that has the App Store as well. He can just buy the game on his phone.